1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. fagner 2016 vs. barkbark

SHOWDOWN

fagner 2016
By Anonymous, ID: h942s5gt
Picture 1
Age:22
Height:168 cm  ·  5'6"
Weight:67 kg  ·  148 lbs
Body Fat %:15.9%
BMI:23.7
Muscle Index:5.1
Sexy Index:6.6
Body Type:
Regular
Healthy
Viking
VS.
barkbark
By jeff13034, ID: uy20l6s8
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:186 cm  ·  6'1"
Weight:76 kg  ·  168 lbs
Body Fat %:12.4%
BMI:22
Muscle Index:5.1
Sexy Index:7.575
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Sexy
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
fagner 2016 Picture 1
barkbark Picture 1
Height
168 cm
5'6"
18 cm
7 inches
shorter
186 cm
6'1"
18 cm
7 inches
taller
Weight
67 kg
148 lbs
9 kg
20 lbs
lighter
76 kg
168 lbs
9 kg
20 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
15.9%
Healthy
28.2%  higher
12.4%
Fit
22%  lower
Muscle Index
5.1
Swole-ish
5.1
Swole-ish
Sexy Index
6.6
12.9%   less sexy
7.575
Sexy
14.8% sexier
BMI
23.7
Average
8.1%  higher
22
Average
7.5%  lower
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2180 kcal
Average
10.4%  lower
2434 kcal
High
11.7%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.69
Very High
2.9%  lower
1.74
HOLY SHIT
3%  higher
FFMI (?)
20
Average
4.2%  higher
19.2
Average
4%  lower
Lean Mass
56.3 kg
124 lbs
10.3 kg
23 lbs
lighter
66.6 kg
147 lbs
10.3 kg
23 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
50.6 cm
20 inches
0.8%  lower
51 cm
20 inches
0.8%  higher
Waist Span
29.9 cm
12 inches
2.4%  higher
29.2 cm
11 inches
2.3%  lower
Fat Mass
10.7 kg
24 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
heavier
9.4 kg
21 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
lighter
Age
22
4y older
18
4y younger

User comments