1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. T-Tam vs. Feb9- Cutting

SHOWDOWN

T-Tam
By Anonymous, ID: 3z19rviy
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:172 cm  ·  5'8"
Weight:68 kg  ·  150 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:7
Body Type:
Regular
Fit
Viking
VS.
Feb9- Cutting
By Anonymous, ID: 95y7099k
Picture 1
Age:30
Height:169 cm  ·  5'7"
Weight:63 kg  ·  139 lbs
Body Fat %:14.7%
BMI:22.1
Muscle Index:4.6
Sexy Index:5.5
Body Type:
Regular
Fit
Parsnip
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
T-Tam Picture 1
Feb9- Cutting Picture 1
Height
172 cm
5'8"
3 cm
1 inches
taller
169 cm
5'7"
3 cm
1 inches
shorter
Weight
68 kg
150 lbs
5 kg
11 lbs
heavier
63 kg
139 lbs
5 kg
11 lbs
lighter
Body Fat %
14.4%
Fit
2%  lower
14.7%
Fit
2.1%  higher
Muscle Index
5.2
Swole-ish
13%  swoler
4.6
11.5%  less swole
Sexy Index
7
Sexy
27.3% sexier
5.5
21.4%   less sexy
BMI
23
Average
4.2%  higher
22.1
Average
4%  lower
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2158 kcal
Average
7.4%  higher
2010 kcal
Average
6.9%  lower
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.72
HOLY SHIT
4.2%  higher
1.65
Very High
4.1%  lower
FFMI (?)
19.7
Average
4.8%  higher
18.8
Average
4.6%  lower
Lean Mass
58.2 kg
128 lbs
4.5 kg
10 lbs
heavier
53.7 kg
118 lbs
4.5 kg
10 lbs
lighter
Shoulders Span
50.7 cm
20 inches
5.4%  higher
48.1 cm
19 inches
5.1%  lower
Waist Span
29.4 cm
12 inches
1%  higher
29.1 cm
11 inches
1%  lower
Fat Mass
9.8 kg
22 lbs
0.5 kg
1 lbs
heavier
9.3 kg
21 lbs
0.5 kg
1 lbs
lighter
Age
18
12y younger
30
12y older

User comments