Physiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabaseAmerican actress - Instagram Profile
Alicia Silverstone was still a teenager when she became one of the faces of the 1990s: first as the obsessive fan in the thriller The Crush (1993), which won her two MTV Movie Awards, then in a run of Aerosmith videos, "Cryin'", "Amazing" and "Crazy". Clueless (1995) made her Cher Horowitz, Beverly Hills' most confident matchmaker. She played Batgirl in Batman & Robin (1997), and later became one of Hollywood's best-known vegans with her bestselling book The Kind Diet.
This scan records 165 cm and about 75 kg, with body fat around 36%, toward the higher end of the range for women. It is not what her work has ever turned on: Silverstone made her name with comic timing and a distinctive voice, and the numbers describe an everyday, non-athletic build rather than a body prepared for a part.
Loading…
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -1.5° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +3.4° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +0.4° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 9.0 cm | 8.1 cm | +10.8% | natural — left side larger |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 7.2 cm | 8.3 cm | -14.9% | notable — right side larger |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 38.8 cm | 39.1 cm | -0.8% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 65.2 seconds
