Physiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabaseAmerican actress - Instagram Profile
Jennifer Garner spent years in ballet classes as a child, and that body control came in handy when she became television's action heroine of the early 2000s. As double agent Sydney Bristow in Alias (2001–2006) she did much of her own stunt work and won a Golden Globe, then played the assassin Elektra in Daredevil (2003) and its spin-off. She showed her comic side in 13 Going on 30 (2004) and has since moved between genres, from Juno and Dallas Buyers Club to The Adam Project, returning as Elektra in Deadpool & Wolverine (2024).
This scan records 57 kg at 173 cm with about 25% body fat. That is a tall, very light frame, with a body-fat level towards the lower end of what is typical for women, and a reminder of how much of her action work rested on agility rather than bulk.
Loading…
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +2.3° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | notable — leaning right |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +3.0° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +0.4° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 8.0 cm | 7.2 cm | +10.9% | natural — left side larger |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 5.0 cm | 5.0 cm | -1.3% | natural — balanced |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 14.9 cm | 14.6 cm | +1.7% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 19.0 seconds
