Physiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabaseEnglish actress - Instagram Profile
Naomi Watts was in her thirties, after years of small parts, when David Lynch cast her in Mulholland Drive (2001), the film that made her a star almost overnight. Born in Shoreham, England, she moved to Australia at 14 and began her career there, becoming close friends with another young actress, Nicole Kidman. Hollywood stardom followed quickly: the horror hit The Ring (2002), Oscar nominations for 21 Grams and The Impossible, and the lead in Peter Jackson's King Kong (2005). She later returned to Lynch for Twin Peaks: The Return.
At 164 cm and 54 kg she has a small, light frame, and about 27% body fat sits within the typical range for women. Her career has rarely asked for a particular physique; the demands have been emotional more than physical, from Lynch's dream logic to the tsunami scenes of The Impossible, filmed in huge water tanks.
Loading…
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +0.7° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +1.9° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | 0.0° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 7.6 cm | 7.2 cm | +5.8% | natural — left side larger |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 6.8 cm | 6.9 cm | -1.0% | natural — balanced |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 14.5 cm | 14.4 cm | +1.0% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 18.5 seconds
