Physiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabaseBritish actor (born 1977) - Instagram Profile
In 2022 Tom Hardy turned up at a charity jiu-jitsu tournament in Wolverhampton, run by the veterans' charity REORG he supports, and won gold; weeks later he did it again at an open championship in Milton Keynes, entered under his real name, Edward Hardy. The grappling fits a career full of physical roles: the prisoner Charles Bronson in Bronson, the fighter Tommy Conlon in Warrior, Bane in The Dark Knight Rises, Max Rockatansky in Mad Max: Fury Road and Eddie Brock in the Venom films.
This scan, at 82 kg and 182 cm with about 23% body fat, is not one of his bulked-up role transformations: it reads as an ordinary weight for his height, with moderate body fat. Hardy has gained and lost considerable size for parts, so the scan is best seen as one point between those extremes rather than his build in any particular film.
Loading…
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +0.5° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +2.1° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +1.4° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 9.6 cm | 10.3 cm | -7.0% | natural — right side larger |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 7.6 cm | 9.0 cm | -16.7% | notable — right side larger |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 17.6 cm | 17.5 cm | +0.5% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 27.9 seconds
