Physiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabasePhysiques DatabaseAmerican actress and model - Instagram Profile
The Bride was half her idea. The credits of Kill Bill say the character was created by 'Q & U', Quentin Tarantino and Uma Thurman, who first sketched her out together while making Pulp Fiction. That earlier film had already turned Thurman's Mia Wallace into one of the defining images of 1990s cinema and earned her an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actress. She went on to win a Golden Globe for the TV film Hysterical Blindness, and in Kill Bill made a yellow jumpsuit and a katana iconic.
At 181 cm, Thurman is tall for a leading actress. This scan puts her at about 72 kg with around 30% body fat, a figure within the typical range for women. Spread over that height, 72 kg is a moderate weight: her BMI works out at about 22.
Loading…
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -0.1° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +2.7° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +2.6° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right hip low |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 7.3 cm | 7.3 cm | 0.0% | natural — balanced |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 7.8 cm | 7.1 cm | +8.5% | natural — left side larger |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 15.2 cm | 14.5 cm | +4.9% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 18.2 seconds
