ProfileProfileProfileProfileEnglish actor - Instagram Profile
Tom Hiddleston is an English actor widely recognized for his portrayal of Loki in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, a role that cemented his status as a global star. Beyond the superhero genre, he has built a respected career in theatre and film, earning critical acclaim for his nuanced performances in productions such as The Deep Blue Sea and War and Peace. His distinctive voice, sharp features, and ability to shift between charm and menace have made him a familiar face to audiences worldwide, bridging the gap between blockbuster entertainment and prestige television.
The scan reflects a lean, athletic build consistent with an actor who maintains a physique suited for both dramatic roles and action sequences. At 187.3 cm, his frame carries a moderate amount of muscle mass, resulting in a streamlined silhouette that appears neither bulky nor slender. This balanced composition supports the physical demands of his profession, allowing for the poised movement and endurance often required on set. The measured body fat percentage indicates a level of conditioning that is functional and sustainable, fitting the aesthetic typically associated with leading men in modern cinema.
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -0.2° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +1.0° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -1.1° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 8.8 cm | 8.4 cm | +4.6% | natural — balanced |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 6.5 cm | 7.9 cm | -20.7% | significant — right side largerlow confidenceA single front-facing photo can't tell a genuinely larger limb from one simply rotated toward the camera, and small limbs like the forearm swing a lot — so a large difference here is more likely a measurement artifact than a real asymmetry. A full-body scan (front + back) averages this out and is far more reliable. |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 16.9 cm | 16.9 cm | 0.0% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 19.4 seconds
Sign in to join the conversation. Sign in
Loading…
