ProfileProfileProfileProfileAustralian actor and singer
Hugh Jackman is an Australian actor and singer widely recognized for his portrayal of Wolverine in the X-Men film franchise, a role that defined much of his career and cemented his status as a global box-office draw. Beyond the superhero genre, he has established himself as a versatile performer with acclaimed stage work, including Tony Award-winning musicals, and leading roles in major motion pictures such as Les Misérables and The Greatest Showman. His enduring presence in entertainment is characterized by a blend of physical action and dramatic depth, making him a familiar face to audiences across multiple decades and mediums.
The scan reflects a solid, athletic build typical of a male actor maintaining a consistent level of physical conditioning for film roles. At 188 cm and 86 kg, the frame supports a functional strength suited for action sequences without excessive bulk. The measured body fat percentage indicates a composition that balances muscle mass with a layer of subcutaneous fat, resulting in a "parsnip" shape where the torso is relatively uniform in width from shoulders to hips. This physique suggests a sustainable, everyday athletic state rather than a peak competition condition, aligning with the needs of a performer who must maintain readiness for varied physical demands over a long career.
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +2.7° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | notable — leaning right |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +3.5° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | 0.0° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 9.9 cm | 9.7 cm | +1.7% | natural — balanced |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 7.6 cm | 8.4 cm | -9.6% | natural — right side larger |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 16.1 cm | 7.0 cm | +78.5% | significant — left side largerlow confidenceA single front-facing photo can't tell a genuinely larger limb from one simply rotated toward the camera, and small limbs like the forearm swing a lot — so a large difference here is more likely a measurement artifact than a real asymmetry. A full-body scan (front + back) averages this out and is far more reliable. |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 51.1 seconds
Sign in to join the conversation. Sign in
Loading…
