Profile
Profile
ProfileAmerican actor
Woody Harrelson is an American actor whose career spans decades of distinctive character roles in both film and television. He first gained widespread recognition for his portrayal of the eccentric bartender Woody Boyd in the sitcom Cheers, a role that established his unique comedic timing and charm. He later solidified his status as a versatile leading man with acclaimed performances in films such as Natural Born Killers, Fargo, and Zombieland, as well as his recent turn as the titular detective in True Detective. Known for his earthy persona and eclectic public image, Harrelson remains a recognizable face in Hollywood, often casting himself as a rugged, grounded figure in ensemble casts.
The scan reflects a build that aligns with his long-standing screen presence: sturdy and solid, yet not overly bulky. At 176.5 cm and weighing approximately 77 kilograms, his frame carries a moderate amount of body fat, resulting in a "parsnip" shape that is wider at the shoulders and tapers toward the waist. This physique suggests a functional strength suited to his active roles, avoiding the extreme leanness often seen in action stars while maintaining a natural, unforced athleticism. It is a body type that has aged with him, consistent with the rugged, approachable aesthetic he has cultivated throughout his career.
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +0.1° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -0.3° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -0.5° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 9.0 cm | 8.9 cm | +0.9% | natural — balanced |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 6.7 cm | 8.2 cm | -21.0% | significant — right side largerlow confidenceA single front-facing photo can't tell a genuinely larger limb from one simply rotated toward the camera, and small limbs like the forearm swing a lot — so a large difference here is more likely a measurement artifact than a real asymmetry. A full-body scan (front + back) averages this out and is far more reliable. |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 16.8 cm | 17.0 cm | -1.0% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 18.5 seconds
Sign in to join the conversation. Sign in
Loading…