ProfileProfileProfileProfileAmerican model and actress
Emily Ratajkowski is an American model and actress who rose to global prominence following her breakout role in Robin Thicke’s "Blurred Lines" music video. She has since established a dual career, becoming a recognizable face in high fashion campaigns for brands like Balmain and Miu Miu, while also securing leading roles in films such as We Are Your Friends and Bad Sisters. Beyond the screen and runway, she is a cultural figure known for her distinctive style, business ventures, and outspoken commentary on feminism and the female gaze in media. Her public persona is inextricably linked to her ability to command attention in both editorial photography and cinematic roles, making her a staple of contemporary pop culture.
The scan reflects a slender, athletic build consistent with her profession as a model. At 170 cm and 54 kg, her frame is lean yet retains a natural softness, characterized by a Zucchini body shape that distributes mass evenly across the torso and hips. This physique supports the aesthetic demands of high-fashion modeling, offering a balanced proportion that photographs well under varied lighting and styling conditions. The measured body fat percentage indicates a healthy, functional composition suited to the physical requirements of long hours on set and in front of the camera, presenting a form that is both toned and naturally curved without appearing overly rigid or extreme.
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -0.3° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -2.8° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — left shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | -1.6° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — balanced |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 6.6 cm | 6.6 cm | -1.2% | natural — balanced |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 6.4 cm | 6.0 cm | +6.5% | natural — left side larger |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 13.3 cm | 13.6 cm | -1.8% | natural — balanced |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 17.3 seconds
Sign in to join the conversation. Sign in
Loading…
