ProfileProfileProfileProfileAmerican actress, producer, comedian
Aubrey Plaza is an American actress and comedian widely recognized for her signature deadpan delivery and dry wit. She first gained prominence for her role as April Ludgate on the NBC mockumentary series Parks and Recreation, a performance that cemented her status as a cult favorite. Plaza has since expanded her career into film and television production, often starring in and producing dark comedies and thrillers such as Safety Not Guaranteed and The White Lotus. Her distinctive persona, characterized by a cool detachment and sharp comedic timing, has made her a recognizable face in contemporary entertainment.
The scan measured a lean, athletic build consistent with her "Mango" body shape, which typically features a defined waist and balanced proportions. At 163.8 cm and weighing approximately 50.8 kg, her frame supports a physique that is both slender and toned. This composition reflects the physical demands of her work in front of the camera, where her natural stature and posture contribute to her unique on-screen presence. The measured body fat percentage indicates a level of leanness that complements her agile and expressive acting style, fitting the aesthetic often associated with leading roles in modern independent cinema and television.
A visual estimation of the areas of your body with a higher likelihood of containing more fat than others -- not a measurement. This feature is experimental; treat the heatmap as an indication, not a clinical finding. Accuracy is best at the extremes of body-fat percentage, weaker in the middle, and atypical body shapes (athletic builds, pregnancy, etc.) may not be modelled well.
| Metric | Value vs reference | Reference | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +0.1° | 0° = vertical (frontal knees-to-head axis) | natural — upright |
| Head forward offset?Accurate to about ±1-2 cm in a single scan -- camera tilt and head rotation (looking up / down / sideways) are the main confounders. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, look straight ahead and keep the camera level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0 = ear in line with the spine axis (no forward head) | — |
| Forward/back lean?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | Upload a side picture to get this metric | 0° = vertical (side knees-to-head axis) | — |
| Shoulder tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +3.3° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right shoulder low |
| Hip tilt?Accurate to about ±2-3° in a single scan -- camera tilt is the main confounder. Trending against your own history (same setup) is more reliable than the absolute number. For best accuracy, make sure the camera was level while scanning. | +4.5° | 0° = level (frontal) | natural — right hip low |
| Segment | Left width | Right width | Δ vs symmetric | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper arm Biceps / triceps | 7.2 cm | 7.8 cm | -6.9% | natural — right side larger |
| Forearm Forearm flexors | 6.5 cm | 6.4 cm | +2.0% | natural — balanced |
| Thigh Quadriceps | 29.6 cm | 13.6 cm | +74.3% | significant — left side largerlow confidenceA single front-facing photo can't tell a genuinely larger limb from one simply rotated toward the camera, and small limbs like the forearm swing a lot — so a large difference here is more likely a measurement artifact than a real asymmetry. A full-body scan (front + back) averages this out and is far more reliable. |
BodyWHAT uses its own proprietary, neural-network-based technology to estimate your body-fat percentage and other body-composition metrics directly from your photos. These in-house models are combined with established anthropometric methods; the published methods and reference ranges below inform and calibrate those estimates.
BodyWHAT's figures are estimates for general fitness and education — not medical advice or a diagnosis. They draw on established methods and published reference ranges:
Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Processed in 18.5 seconds
Sign in to join the conversation. Sign in
Loading…
