1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. kyzal vs. Tuck July 2020

SHOWDOWN

kyzal
By Anonymous, ID: 13ne14zc
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:180 cm  ·  5'11"
Weight:69 kg  ·  152 lbs
Body Fat %:11.9%
BMI:21.3
Muscle Index:5
Sexy Index:5.9
Body Type:
Regular
Fit
Mango
VS.
Tuck July 2020
By Anonymous, ID: 06980e24
Picture 1
Age:26
Height:183 cm  ·  6'0"
Weight:69 kg  ·  152 lbs
Body Fat %:13.1%
BMI:20.6
Muscle Index:4
Sexy Index:5.5
Body Type:
Tall
Skinny
Banana
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
kyzal Picture 1
Tuck July 2020 Picture 1
Height
180 cm
5'11"
3 cm
1 inches
shorter
183 cm
6'0"
3 cm
1 inches
taller
Weight
69 kg
152 lbs
69 kg
152 lbs
Body Fat %
11.9%
Fit
9.2%  lower
13.1%
Skinny
10.1%  higher
Muscle Index
5
Swole-ish
25%  swoler
4
20%  less swole
Sexy Index
5.9
3.5% sexier
5.5
3.4%   less sexy
BMI
21.3
Average
3.4%  higher
20.6
Low
3.3%  lower
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2243 kcal
Average
1.2%  higher
2216 kcal
Average
1.2%  lower
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.51
Average
5.6%  lower
1.60
High
6%  higher
FFMI (?)
18.8
Average
5%  higher
17.9
Average
4.8%  lower
Lean Mass
60.8 kg
134 lbs
0.8 kg
2 lbs
heavier
60 kg
132 lbs
0.8 kg
2 lbs
lighter
Shoulders Span
45 cm
18 inches
4.5%  lower
47.1 cm
19 inches
4.7%  higher
Waist Span
29.8 cm
12 inches
1.4%  higher
29.4 cm
12 inches
1.3%  lower
Fat Mass
8.2 kg
18 lbs
0.8 kg
2 lbs
lighter
9 kg
20 lbs
0.8 kg
2 lbs
heavier
Age
18
8y younger
26
8y older

User comments