1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Marc Fitt vs. Brules Exposed

SHOWDOWN

Marc Fitt
By Anonymous, ID: 1qk90343
Picture 1
Age:23
Height:178 cm  ·  5'10"
Weight:79 kg  ·  174 lbs
Body Fat %:9.7%
BMI:24.9
Muscle Index:8.3
Sexy Index:7.7
Body Type:
Regular
RIPPED
Swole
Viking
VS.
Brules Exposed
By Terrence, ID: 2659ay3a
Picture 1
Age:29
Height:191 cm  ·  6'3"
Weight:97 kg  ·  214 lbs
Body Fat %:12%
BMI:26.6
Muscle Index:8
Sexy Index:7.9
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Swole
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
Marc Fitt Picture 1
Brules Exposed Picture 1
Height
178 cm
5'10"
13 cm
5 inches
shorter
191 cm
6'3"
13 cm
5 inches
taller
Weight
79 kg
174 lbs
18 kg
40 lbs
lighter
97 kg
214 lbs
18 kg
40 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
9.7%
RIPPED
19.2%  lower
12%
Fit
23.7%  higher
Muscle Index
8.3
Swole
3.8%  swoler
8
Swole
3.6%  less swole
Sexy Index
7.7
Sexy
6.4% sexier
7.9
Sexy
6%   less sexy
BMI
24.9
Average
6.2%  lower
26.6
High
6.7%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2592 kcal
High
15.2%  lower
3055 kcal
Big Appetite
17.9%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.70
Very High
2.4%  higher
1.66
Very High
2.4%  lower
FFMI (?)
22.5
High
3.8%  lower
23.4
High
4%  higher
Lean Mass
71.3 kg
157 lbs
14.1 kg
31 lbs
lighter
85.4 kg
188 lbs
14.1 kg
31 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
56.7 cm
22 inches
1.7%  lower
57.7 cm
23 inches
1.8%  higher
Waist Span
33.4 cm
13 inches
3.7%  lower
34.7 cm
14 inches
3.9%  higher
Fat Mass
7.7 kg
17 lbs
3.9 kg
9 lbs
lighter
11.6 kg
26 lbs
3.9 kg
9 lbs
heavier
Age
23
6y younger
29
6y older

User comments