1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Flex mid-cut vs. Cut

SHOWDOWN

Flex mid-cut
By Anonymous, ID: 2y7rzw85
Picture 1
Age:19
Height:183 cm  ·  6'0"
Weight:69 kg  ·  152 lbs
Body Fat %:15.1%
BMI:20.6
Muscle Index:3.3
Sexy Index:6.08
Body Type:
Tall
Healthy
Mango
VS.
Cut
By Anonymous, ID: r65a8385
Picture 1
Age:19
Height:182 cm  ·  5'12"
Weight:73 kg  ·  161 lbs
Body Fat %:12.5%
BMI:22
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:6.9
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
Flex mid-cut Picture 1
Cut Picture 1
Height
183 cm
6'0"
1 cm
0 inches
taller
182 cm
5'12"
1 cm
0 inches
shorter
Weight
69 kg
152 lbs
4 kg
9 lbs
lighter
73 kg
161 lbs
4 kg
9 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
15.1%
Healthy
20.8%  higher
12.5%
Fit
17.2%  lower
Muscle Index
3.3
36.5%  less swole
5.2
Swole-ish
57.6%  swoler
Sexy Index
6.08
11.9%   less sexy
6.9
13.5% sexier
BMI
20.6
Low
6.5%  lower
22
Average
7%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2170 kcal
Average
7.5%  lower
2345 kcal
High
8.1%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.56
Average
3.7%  lower
1.62
High
3.8%  higher
FFMI (?)
17.5
Low
9.3%  lower
19.3
Average
10.3%  higher
Lean Mass
58.6 kg
129 lbs
5.3 kg
12 lbs
lighter
63.9 kg
141 lbs
5.3 kg
12 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
48.6 cm
19 inches
2.2%  lower
49.7 cm
20 inches
2.3%  higher
Waist Span
31.1 cm
12 inches
1%  higher
30.8 cm
12 inches
1%  lower
Fat Mass
10.4 kg
23 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
heavier
9.1 kg
20 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
lighter
Age
19
19

User comments