1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. boom vs. Mike Matthews

SHOWDOWN

boom
By Anonymous, ID: 43e83q32
Picture 1
Age:40
Height:175 cm  ·  5'9"
Weight:69 kg  ·  152 lbs
Body Fat %:15.1%
BMI:22.5
Muscle Index:4.6
Sexy Index:6.5
Body Type:
Regular
Healthy
Parsnip
VS.
Mike Matthews
By Adregia, ID: mm6e8n3x
Picture 1
Age:33
Height:188 cm  ·  6'2"
Weight:83 kg  ·  183 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23.5
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:7
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
boom Picture 1
Mike Matthews Picture 1
Height
175 cm
5'9"
13 cm
5 inches
shorter
188 cm
6'2"
13 cm
5 inches
taller
Weight
69 kg
152 lbs
14 kg
31 lbs
lighter
83 kg
183 lbs
14 kg
31 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
15.1%
Healthy
4.9%  higher
14.4%
Fit
4.6%  lower
Muscle Index
4.6
11.5%  less swole
5.2
Swole-ish
13%  swoler
Sexy Index
6.5
9.7%   less sexy
7
Sexy
10.8% sexier
BMI
22.5
Average
4%  lower
23.5
Average
4.2%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2170 kcal
Average
16%  lower
2582 kcal
High
19%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.60
High
4.2%  lower
1.67
Very High
4.4%  higher
FFMI (?)
19.1
Average
5%  lower
20.1
Average
5.2%  higher
Lean Mass
58.6 kg
129 lbs
12.4 kg
27 lbs
lighter
71 kg
157 lbs
12.4 kg
27 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
51 cm
20 inches
13%  lower
58.6 cm
23 inches
14.9%  higher
Waist Span
31.9 cm
13 inches
9.1%  lower
35.1 cm
14 inches
10%  higher
Fat Mass
10.4 kg
23 lbs
1.6 kg
4 lbs
lighter
12 kg
26 lbs
1.6 kg
4 lbs
heavier
Age
40
7y older
33
7y younger

User comments