1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. T-Tam vs. Mid-cut

SHOWDOWN

T-Tam
By Anonymous, ID: 3z19rviy
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:172 cm  ·  5'8"
Weight:68 kg  ·  150 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:7
Body Type:
Regular
Fit
Viking
VS.
Mid-cut
By 115340080517142677627, ID: 5xh5yax9
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:175 cm  ·  5'9"
Weight:76 kg  ·  168 lbs
Body Fat %:16%
BMI:24.8
Muscle Index:5.5
Sexy Index:5.3
Body Type:
Regular
Healthy
Beetroot
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
T-Tam Picture 1
Mid-cut Picture 1
Height
172 cm
5'8"
3 cm
1 inches
shorter
175 cm
5'9"
3 cm
1 inches
taller
Weight
68 kg
150 lbs
8 kg
18 lbs
lighter
76 kg
168 lbs
8 kg
18 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
14.4%
Fit
10%  lower
16%
Healthy
11.1%  higher
Muscle Index
5.2
Swole-ish
5.5%  less swole
5.5
Swole-ish
5.8%  swoler
Sexy Index
7
Sexy
32.1% sexier
5.3
24.3%   less sexy
BMI
23
Average
7.4%  lower
24.8
Average
8%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2158 kcal
Average
7.9%  lower
2344 kcal
High
8.6%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.72
HOLY SHIT
22%  higher
1.41
Average
18%  lower
FFMI (?)
19.7
Average
5.3%  lower
20.8
Average
5.6%  higher
Lean Mass
58.2 kg
128 lbs
5.6 kg
12 lbs
lighter
63.8 kg
141 lbs
5.6 kg
12 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
50.7 cm
20 inches
5%  higher
48.3 cm
19 inches
4.7%  lower
Waist Span
29.4 cm
12 inches
14.3%  lower
34.3 cm
14 inches
16.7%  higher
Fat Mass
9.8 kg
22 lbs
2.4 kg
5 lbs
lighter
12.2 kg
27 lbs
2.4 kg
5 lbs
heavier
Age
18
18

User comments