1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. T-Tam vs. Mini Cut Progress

SHOWDOWN

T-Tam
By Anonymous, ID: 3z19rviy
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:172 cm  ·  5'8"
Weight:68 kg  ·  150 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:7
Body Type:
Regular
Fit
Viking
VS.
Mini Cut Progress
By Anonymous, ID: a54a0vzy
Picture 1
Age:26
Height:168 cm  ·  5'6"
Weight:65 kg  ·  143 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23
Muscle Index:5.3
Sexy Index:7.373
Body Type:
Regular
Fit
Parsnip
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
T-Tam Picture 1
Mini Cut Progress Picture 1
Height
172 cm
5'8"
4 cm
2 inches
taller
168 cm
5'6"
4 cm
2 inches
shorter
Weight
68 kg
150 lbs
3 kg
7 lbs
heavier
65 kg
143 lbs
3 kg
7 lbs
lighter
Body Fat %
14.4%
Fit
14.4%
Fit
Muscle Index
5.2
Swole-ish
1.9%  less swole
5.3
Swole-ish
1.9%  swoler
Sexy Index
7
Sexy
5.1%   less sexy
7.373
Sexy
5.3% sexier
BMI
23
Average
0.2%  lower
23
Average
0.2%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2158 kcal
Average
4.1%  higher
2073 kcal
Average
3.9%  lower
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.72
HOLY SHIT
8.9%  higher
1.58
High
8.1%  lower
FFMI (?)
19.7
Average
19.7
Average
Lean Mass
58.2 kg
128 lbs
2.6 kg
6 lbs
heavier
55.6 kg
123 lbs
2.6 kg
6 lbs
lighter
Shoulders Span
50.7 cm
20 inches
5.8%  higher
47.9 cm
19 inches
5.5%  lower
Waist Span
29.4 cm
12 inches
2.6%  lower
30.2 cm
12 inches
2.7%  higher
Fat Mass
9.8 kg
22 lbs
0.4 kg
1 lbs
heavier
9.4 kg
21 lbs
0.4 kg
1 lbs
lighter
Age
18
8y younger
26
8y older

User comments