1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. Aug 16 vs. Cutting V 2.0

SHOWDOWN

Aug 16
By testUser001, ID: a2g5ns84
Picture 1
Age:25
Height:183 cm  ·  6'0"
Weight:73 kg  ·  161 lbs
Body Fat %:11.6%
BMI:21.8
Muscle Index:5.4
Sexy Index:7.5
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Sexy
Mango
VS.
Cutting V 2.0
By Anonymous, ID: cq532m65
Picture 1
Age:22
Height:183 cm  ·  6'0"
Weight:77 kg  ·  170 lbs
Body Fat %:13.6%
BMI:23
Muscle Index:5.3
Sexy Index:7.2
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
Aug 16 Picture 1
Cutting V 2.0 Picture 1
Height
183 cm
6'0"
183 cm
6'0"
Weight
73 kg
161 lbs
4 kg
9 lbs
lighter
77 kg
170 lbs
4 kg
9 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
11.6%
Fit
14.7%  lower
13.6%
Fit
17.2%  higher
Muscle Index
5.4
Swole-ish
1.9%  swoler
5.3
Swole-ish
1.9%  less swole
Sexy Index
7.5
Sexy
4.2% sexier
7.2
Sexy
4%   less sexy
BMI
21.8
Average
5.2%  lower
23
Average
5.5%  higher
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2367 kcal
High
2.7%  lower
2433 kcal
High
2.8%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.51
Average
9%  lower
1.66
Very High
9.9%  higher
FFMI (?)
19.3
Average
3%  lower
19.9
Average
3.1%  higher
Lean Mass
64.5 kg
142 lbs
2 kg
4 lbs
lighter
66.5 kg
147 lbs
2 kg
4 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
50.7 cm
20 inches
2.5%  lower
52 cm
20 inches
2.6%  higher
Waist Span
33.6 cm
13 inches
7.7%  higher
31.2 cm
12 inches
7.1%  lower
Fat Mass
8.5 kg
19 lbs
2 kg
4 lbs
lighter
10.5 kg
23 lbs
2 kg
4 lbs
heavier
Age
25
3y older
22
3y younger

User comments