1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. David Laid vs. Miles Chamley-Watson

SHOWDOWN

David Laid
By davidlaid, ID: m3kagn48
Picture 1
Age:19
Height:190 cm  ·  6'3"
Weight:90 kg  ·  198 lbs
Body Fat %:15.6%
BMI:24.9
Muscle Index:5.5
Sexy Index:7.2
Body Type:
Tall
Healthy
Viking
VS.
Miles Chamley-Watson
By Anonymous, ID: th60iq3w
Picture 1
Age:28
Height:193 cm  ·  6'4"
Weight:87 kg  ·  192 lbs
Body Fat %:17.6%
BMI:23.4
Muscle Index:3.6
Sexy Index:5.6
Body Type:
Tall
Healthy
Parsnip
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
David Laid Picture 1
Miles Chamley-Watson Picture 1
Height
190 cm
6'3"
3 cm
1 inches
shorter
193 cm
6'4"
3 cm
1 inches
taller
Weight
90 kg
198 lbs
3 kg
7 lbs
heavier
87 kg
192 lbs
3 kg
7 lbs
lighter
Body Fat %
15.6%
Healthy
11.4%  lower
17.6%
Healthy
12.8%  higher
Muscle Index
5.5
Swole-ish
52.8%  swoler
3.6
34.5%  less swole
Sexy Index
7.2
Sexy
25% sexier
5.6
20%   less sexy
BMI
24.9
Average
6.7%  higher
23.4
Average
6.3%  lower
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2744 kcal
High
5.4%  higher
2603 kcal
High
5.1%  lower
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
2.22
HOLY SHIT
43.2%  higher
1.55
Average
30.2%  lower
FFMI (?)
21
Above Average
9.4%  higher
19.2
Average
8.6%  lower
Lean Mass
76 kg
168 lbs
4.3 kg
9 lbs
heavier
71.7 kg
158 lbs
4.3 kg
9 lbs
lighter
Shoulders Span
63.4 cm
25 inches
5%  higher
60.4 cm
24 inches
4.7%  lower
Waist Span
28.6 cm
11 inches
26.5%  lower
38.9 cm
15 inches
36%  higher
Fat Mass
14 kg
31 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
lighter
15.3 kg
34 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
heavier
Age
19
9y younger
28
9y older

User comments