1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. fagner 2016 vs. Mike Matthews

SHOWDOWN

fagner 2016
By Anonymous, ID: h942s5gt
Picture 1
Age:22
Height:168 cm  ·  5'6"
Weight:67 kg  ·  148 lbs
Body Fat %:15.9%
BMI:23.7
Muscle Index:5.1
Sexy Index:6.6
Body Type:
Regular
Healthy
Viking
VS.
Mike Matthews
By Adregia, ID: mm6e8n3x
Picture 1
Age:33
Height:188 cm  ·  6'2"
Weight:83 kg  ·  183 lbs
Body Fat %:14.4%
BMI:23.5
Muscle Index:5.2
Sexy Index:7
Body Type:
Tall
Fit
Viking
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
fagner 2016 Picture 1
Mike Matthews Picture 1
Height
168 cm
5'6"
20 cm
8 inches
shorter
188 cm
6'2"
20 cm
8 inches
taller
Weight
67 kg
148 lbs
16 kg
35 lbs
lighter
83 kg
183 lbs
16 kg
35 lbs
heavier
Body Fat %
15.9%
Healthy
10.4%  higher
14.4%
Fit
9.4%  lower
Muscle Index
5.1
Swole-ish
1.9%  less swole
5.2
Swole-ish
2%  swoler
Sexy Index
6.6
8.3%   less sexy
7
Sexy
9.1% sexier
BMI
23.7
Average
1.1%  higher
23.5
Average
1.1%  lower
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
2180 kcal
Average
15.6%  lower
2582 kcal
High
18.4%  higher
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.69
Very High
1.2%  higher
1.67
Very High
1.2%  lower
FFMI (?)
20
Average
0.5%  lower
20.1
Average
0.5%  higher
Lean Mass
56.3 kg
124 lbs
14.7 kg
32 lbs
lighter
71 kg
157 lbs
14.7 kg
32 lbs
heavier
Shoulders Span
50.6 cm
20 inches
13.7%  lower
58.6 cm
23 inches
15.8%  higher
Waist Span
29.9 cm
12 inches
14.8%  lower
35.1 cm
14 inches
17.4%  higher
Fat Mass
10.7 kg
24 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
lighter
12 kg
26 lbs
1.3 kg
3 lbs
heavier
Age
22
11y younger
33
11y older

User comments