1. Home
  2. Comparisons
  3. 2020 February Mid Cut 140 vs. AmirG

SHOWDOWN

2020 February Mid Cut 140
By ejstraub, ID: spw2s920
Picture 1
Age:38
Height:170 cm  ·  5'7"
Weight:63 kg  ·  139 lbs
Body Fat %:15.4%
BMI:21.8
Muscle Index:4.1
Sexy Index:6
Body Type:
Regular
Healthy
Mango
VS.
AmirG
By Anonymous, ID: uq7yi967
Picture 1
Age:18
Height:173 cm  ·  5'8"
Weight:60 kg  ·  132 lbs
Body Fat %:12.7%
BMI:20.1
Muscle Index:4
Sexy Index:7.2
Body Type:
Regular
Skinny
Mango
↓↓  Scroll Down for Comparison Shots  ↓↓
Full Body Scale
Full Size Comparison Click for other views
Centered on Torso
Torso Comparison Click for other views
With Transparency
Torso Comparison Torso Comparison Use slider on the right
↓↓   Stats Breakdown   ↓↓
2020 February Mid Cut 140 Picture 1
AmirG Picture 1
Height
170 cm
5'7"
3 cm
1 inches
shorter
173 cm
5'8"
3 cm
1 inches
taller
Weight
63 kg
139 lbs
3 kg
7 lbs
heavier
60 kg
132 lbs
3 kg
7 lbs
lighter
Body Fat %
15.4%
Healthy
21.3%  higher
12.7%
Skinny
17.5%  lower
Muscle Index
4.1
2.5%  swoler
4
2.4%  less swole
Sexy Index
6
16.7%   less sexy
7.2
Sexy
20% sexier
BMI
21.8
Average
8.7%  higher
20.1
Low
8%  lower
Daily Calorie Needs  (?)
1996 kcal
Average
1.6%  higher
1965 kcal
Average
1.6%  lower
Shoulders-to-Waist Width Ratio
1.48
Average
4.5%  lower
1.55
Average
4.7%  higher
FFMI (?)
18.4
Average
5.1%  higher
17.5
Low
4.9%  lower
Lean Mass
53.3 kg
118 lbs
0.9 kg
2 lbs
heavier
52.4 kg
116 lbs
0.9 kg
2 lbs
lighter
Shoulders Span
46.3 cm
18 inches
2.9%  lower
47.7 cm
19 inches
3%  higher
Waist Span
31.2 cm
12 inches
1.3%  higher
30.8 cm
12 inches
1.3%  lower
Fat Mass
9.7 kg
21 lbs
2.1 kg
5 lbs
heavier
7.6 kg
17 lbs
2.1 kg
5 lbs
lighter
Age
38
20y older
18
20y younger

User comments